Research Associates Aaron Kercheval and Sharon Newbill (2002) reported the key effective test preparation strategies included:
- Direct instruction in test-taking skills
- Extensive use of practice tests
- Instructional practice altered to mirror form and content of the proficiency tests
- Intervention strategies to identify students needing help to pass proficiency tests Variety of intervention/remediation programs offered at variety of times during school day, and before/after school
- Intervention specialists hired or teachers reassigned or paid to conduct remediation programs
- Students recognized and rewarded for success (p. 37).
According to Douglas Reeves (2004), "Even if the state test is dominated by lower-level thinking skills and questions are posed in a multiple-choice format, the best preparation for such tests is not mindless testing drills, but extensive student writing, accompanied by thinking, analysis, and reasoning" (p. 92).
Emphasis on literacy was another key effective practice in improved school districts (Kercheval & Newbill, 2002). In other words, good instruction is the best test preparation!
THE TESTS
TAKS-Accommodated
For students who need specific modifications to the test, such as larger font and fewer items on a page. It will use the same questions and passing standards as the TAKS for general-education students. It is available in Spanish.
The following TAKS-Accommodated grades and subjects will be tested this spring and included in this year's state accountability ratings:
Science: Grades five, eight, 10 and 11
Social studies: Grades eight, 10 and 11
English language arts: Grade 11
Mathematics: Grade 11
The TAKS-Accommodated will be available for all tests during the 2009-10 school year.
TAKS-Modified
Besides having a larger font and fewer items per page, it has fewer answer choices and simpler vocabulary and sentence structure. It is not available in Spanish. For the federal rating, only 2 percent of students in the district can be scored "proficient" on the TAKS-M; additional students who take the test will be counted as "non-proficient," said Criss Cloudt, TEA associate commissioner.
The TAKS-M will not be factored into state accountability ratings until 2009-10 at the earliest. It will be given in the following grades and subjects this spring:
Reading: Grades three-eight
English language arts: Grade 10
Mathematics: Grades three-eight and 10
Science: Grades five, eight and 10
TAKS-Alternate
For students with significant cognitive disabilities. Teachers will observe students as they complete activities that link to their grade-level curriculum.
Only 1 percent of a district's students can be scored "proficient" on the TAKS-Alt; additional students who take it will be rated "non-proficient." The test will not be factored into state accountability until 2009-10 at the earliest.
The test will be given to students in the following grades and subjects this spring:
Reading: Grades three-nine
Mathematics: Grades three-11
Writing: Grades four and seven
English language arts: Grades 10 and 11
Science: Grades five, eight, 10 and 11
Social studies: Grades eight, 10 and 11
Please note that the following documents have been posted to the Student Assessment division website:
TAKS-Alt. Online Field Test Grades 3-11: Testing Window (Jan. 9 - Feb. 2)
Please note:
TAKS-ALT :
In a communication from Patricia Otto, TEA Student Assessment, we have learned that the TAKS-Alt online system will not be available for viewing after the submission window deadline of April 13, 2007, at 11:59 pm. This means that any printing of documentation forms must be completed before that time on Friday. The system will not be available again until September 1, 2007.
This notice has been posted on the TAKS-Alt online site; we anticipate a
broadcast email from TEA/Pearson but as time is of the essence, we wanted to let you know.
Students with disabilities for whom TAKS, even with allowable modifications, is not an appropriate assessment are currently tested using either the State Developed Alternative Assessment (SDAA) II or a Locally Developed Alternate Assessment (LDAA). However, due to requirements contained in the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and the reauthorized Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), these tests will have to be replaced with new tests. The SDAA II, the LDAA and the new slate of replacement tests (TAKS-Inclusive, TAKS-Alternate and 2 Percent Assessment) will be implemented as follows:
SDAA II in 2006 and 2007: The SDAA II will continue to be used during the 2006-07 school year, after which it will be discontinued.
LDAA in 2006 and 2007: The LDAA will continue to be used during the 2006-07 school year for special education students for whom TAKS, TAKS-I and SDAA II are not appropriate; however, the LDAA will be discontinued after this year.
TAKS Inclusive (TAKS-I): This test is for students receiving special education services for whom TAKS, even with allowable modifications, is not an appropriate assessment. Students may only take TAKS-I tests at their enrolled grade level. TAKS-I is initially given at grades and subjects where SDAA is not. After SDAA is discontinued, TAKS-I will expand to include the SDAA II-tested grades and subjects.
TAKS-Alternate (TAKS-Alt): The federal NCLB Act puts a cap of 1 percent on the number of special education students who can be tested on an off-grade level test and still be counted as proficient for purposes of meeting adequate yearly progress (AYP). Only students who are “significantly and cognitively disabled” can be included in this group. The TAKS-Alt is an assessment currently being developed to meet federal requirements for these students. In 2007-08, TAKS-Alt will replace the LDAA for grades 3-9 reading; grades 3-10 and exit-level math; grades 4 and 7 writing; grades 5, 8, 10 and exit-level science; grades 8, 10 and exit-level social studies; and grades 10 and exit-level English language arts. TAKS-Alt is designed to measure the academic progress of students who meet participation requirements.
2 Percent assessment: Proposed regulations under the NCLB also allow states and local school districts to count as proficient for purposes of AYP the scores of up to 2 percent of students who are assessed on modified achievement standards that are aligned with grade-level content standards. Thus, the scores of a total of 3 percent, or roughly 30 percent of a state’s student population who take an off-grade-level test or are tested on modified achievement standards, can count as proficient for purposes of AYP. Accordingly, TEA is developing a test for these students as well.